Fixing Wages of Poultry Plant Workers

Jien et al v. Perdue Farms, Inc. et al, Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-02521 (U.S. District Court for Maryland)

This is a class action lawsuit against the leading poultry producers in the United States for allegedly conspiring to fix and depress the compensation paid to hundreds of thousands of workers at poultry processing plants.

The defendants named in the lawsuit include 14 poultry producers and many of their subsidiaries (“Defendant Poultry Producers”)—such as Tyson Foods, Inc., Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, and Perdue Farms, Inc.—that produce more than 80 percent of the poultry sold in the United States.  Two consulting companies that facilitate the exchange of compensation data—Agri Stats, Inc. (“Agri Stats”) and Webber, Meng, Sahl and Company, Inc. (“WMS”)—are also named as defendants in the lawsuit.

The Defendant Poultry Producers operate approximately 200 poultry processing plants in the continental United States.  These poultry processing plants employ hundreds of thousands of workers who process live chickens and turkeys into poultry products sold to retailers and consumers.  The Defendant Poultry Producers compensate those workers with hourly wages and employment benefits.

The lawsuit alleges that, since January 1, 2009, the defendants have conspired to fix and depress the hourly wages and benefits paid to workers in poultry processing plants in violation of the federal antitrust laws.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants formed, implemented, monitored and enforced the conspiracy in three ways.  First, the lawsuit alleges that senior executives of the Defendant Poultry Producers held recurring “off the books” in-person meetings at the Hilton Sandestin Resort Hotel & Spa in Destin, Florida, during which they exchanged information about, discussed, agreed upon and ultimately fixed the wages and benefits of workers in poultry processing plants at artificially depressed levels.

Second, the lawsuit alleges that, on a highly frequent basis, the Defendant Poultry Producers exchanged detailed, current and non-public wage and benefits information through surveys conducted by Agri Stats and WMS.  The lawsuit alleges that the Defendant Poultry Producers used the competitively sensitive data obtained from those surveys to fix and depress the compensation paid to workers in poultry processing plants and ensure that no conspirator deviated from the conspiracy.

Third, the lawsuit alleges that local managers of the Defendant Poultry Producers’ plants exchanged compensation information.  The lawsuit alleges that those plant managers frequently reached out to counterparts at rival poultry processing plants to exchange wage and benefits data, including data regarding plans for future wages and benefits.  The lawsuit alleges that the data obtained from these plant-to-plant information exchanges was provided to executives of the Defendant Poultry Producers, who used the data to help fix compensation.

The lawsuit alleges that the intended and actual effect of defendants’ conspiracy to fix compensation has been to reduce and suppress the wages and benefits paid to workers in poultry processing plants to levels materially lower than they would have been in a competitive market.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a class consisting of non-managerial persons employed by the Defendant Poultry Producers at poultry processing plants in the continental United States from January 1, 2009 until the present.  The lawsuit seeks to prevent the defendants from continuing their conspiracy and to recover financial damages for the class of workers.

A copy of the complaint is available HERE.

If you have any questions concerning this case, or would like to share information related to this case, please contact attorney George Farah at [email protected] or 212-477-8090.

 

 

We are lawyers who seek to improve the world. We fight for: workers deprived of wages, consumers deceived about products, tenants denied access to housing, farmers mistreated by processors, parents deprived of adequate parental leave, investors who were defrauded, small businesses harmed by antitrust violations, persons with disabilities denied access, whistleblowers who uncover fraud, and women and communities of color subject to discrimination.

Get in touch

<

Headquarters

777 6th Street NW
Washington, DC 20001
202-559-2433

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
DISCLAIMER